Mean or Green? Where there’s the will, there’s a way…
For months I had passed by the streetcar tracks on St. Clair Avenue and wondered why such vast dismal stretches of pavement don’t incorporate natural vegetation.
Toronto’s St. Clair Avenue West (click on image to enlarge)
Why are these tracks “mean” instead of green? Is this just another case of the way things have always been done? Has no one questioned this “dead zone”?
In salutogenic terms, do paved tracks cause health or cause dis-ease? They seem to me an obvious example of an under-performing asset instead of what they can be – an agent for health.
Daydreaming on, I considered several possible concerns regarding a shift to green tracks, such as maintenance, road salt, the cost/benefit business case, as well as potential damage by other vehicles.
Like all such shifts in thinking, this degree of change requires a willingness to find a way through perceived obstacles. As an abstract concept, innovation usually sounds attractive, yet the reality of being the first to do something can be difficult for ultimate decision-makers.
Would the shift to green tracks in Toronto require such a leap of faith?
Well, as it turns out, there are several longstanding precedents in Europe, while the demand for living tracks is growing worldwide.
Green tracks have been in use in Berlin since 1995. Similar public transit greenways already exist in Barcelona, the Czech Republic, Frankfurt, Grenoble, Bilbao and Strasbourg. Such hardy plants as sedum serve to reduce the urban heat island effect, provide a permeable surface for storm water and reduce dust pollution.
Instead of dwelling on reasons why we can’t do this, why aren’t we drawing on leading global practices? Moreover, in the spirit of pop-up experiments, why not install a trial section?
- Tye Farrow